Unfair Competition Cases- False Publicity Committed by an Exhibition Company

文章摘要 A private exhibition company based in Guangdong earned its reputation after organizing exhibitions of an industry for more than 10 years. A well-known exhibition company based in Shanghai cooperated with a foreign company and introduced a world-renowned exhibition brand of that specific industry to

A private exhibition company based in Guangdong earned its reputation after organizing exhibitions of an industry for more than 10 years. A well-known exhibition company based in Shanghai cooperated with a foreign company and introduced a world-renowned exhibition brand of that specific industry to China. The two also decided to hold exhibition in Guangdong. In order to hinder the entry of its competitors, the Guangdong-based company filed complaints with the Administration of Industry and Commerce of Guangdong and Shanghai, claiming that the Shanghai-based company had committed false publicity and requiring the administration mete out punishment. After investigation, it was found that no false publicity was committed. Therefore, no administrative punishment was made.


The Guangdong-based company proceeded to file a lawsuit with the local court on the ground that false publicity had been made. Mr. Yang and his team advised the Shanghai-based company in its collection of evidence, and helped it handle and cooperate with the investigation launched by the Administration of Industrial and Commercial. In order to meet the higher requirement of providing proof as set up by the court, Mr. Yang and his team fully employed evidence preservation tactics such as notarization, and collected a lot of evidence to refute the opposing party’s claim. The legal team also pointed out that the company had abused its right to sue as a measure of unfair competition. Eventually, the court ruled in the Shanghai-based company’s favor and overruled all the claims made by the Guangdong-based company.

最后编辑于:2018-08-27 22:02
最后更新:2018年8月27日

常见法律问题

投资并购中如何进行尽职调查?

投资并购尽职调查应包括:法律尽职调查(公司设立、股权结构、合同、诉讼等)、财务尽职调查、商业尽职调查。建议委托专业律师和会计师共同进行,重点关注隐性债务、知识产权、劳动用工等风险领域。

公司并购有哪些法律风险?

公司并购主要法律风险包括:1)股权权属瑕疵风险;2)隐性债务和或有负债风险;3)劳动用工风险;4)知识产权风险;5)反垄断审查风险。建议在交易前进行全面尽职调查,并在协议中设置适当的保障条款。

并购交易中如何设计交易结构?

并购交易结构设计需考虑:1)股权收购vs资产收购的选择;2)支付方式(现金/股权/混合);3)分步交易安排;4)税收筹划;5)风险分配机制。建议由律师、税务师和财务顾问共同参与。

以上内容仅供参考,不构成法律意见。如需专业法律服务,请联系杨春宝一级律师:chambers.yang@dentons.cn

  • 本站声明:本站所载之法律论文、法律评论、案例、法律咨询等,除非另有注明,著作权人均为站长杨春宝高级律师本人。欢迎其他网站链接,但是,未经书面许可,不得擅自摘编、转载。引用及经许可转载时均应注明作者和出处"法律桥",并链接本站。本站网址:http://www.LawBridge.org。
  •  
  •         本站所有内容(包括法律咨询、法律法规)仅供参考,不构成法律意见,本站不对资料的完整性和时效性负责。您在处理具体法律事务时,请洽询有资质的律师。本站将努力为广大网友提供更好的服务,但不对本站提供的任何免费服务作出正式的承诺。本站所载投稿文章,其言论不代表本站观点,如需使用,请与原作者联系,版权归原作者所有。

发表回复