The agreement constitutes a legal and business framework for the two organizations to work together at both senior and staff levels, DTCC said.
SD&C was formed six years ago, with a mission of building "an open, flexible and unified securities registration and settlement system in line with international standards and practices," the organization's vice chairman and general manager, Ying Jin, said at the signing ceremony. SD&C had previously established relationships with stock exchanges and depository and clearing institutions in Asia, Europe, North America, Oceania, South America and Africa, she said.
"As the central securities depository of this young market, we are trying our best to provide safe, stable and efficient back-office support for the market, which means a huge responsibility for us," Jin said. "With the development of China's securities market, SD&C is enriching its knowledge and experience and exploring an innovative way of development."
In the wording of the MOU, the two sides will "establish a basis of cooperation in securities depository and clearing matters to help foster the prosperity of their financial markets, promote cross-border investment and explore opportunities for cooperation in both depository and clearing operations and in the establishment of an operation linkage." The parties also "anticipate developing a closer working relationship" in the future.

The agreement is an early step that could conceivably lead to actions on cross-border trading later. "We believe that as investors continue to invest more globally each year it is increasingly important that the post-trade infrastructure develop and change to support such trading much better than it does currently," said Callahan. The MOU "allows both DTCC and the SD&C to build systems and operations that will work more efficiently with each other ... and hopefully will result in a more cost-efficient and better way for investors to buy and sell stock in both our countries."
Long operational experience isn't the only reason that the Chinese look to the U.S. for guidance. "Since the U.S. represents the primary base of foreign investment and potential investment flowing into the China markets, it makes sense that SD&C sign the MOU," said Matthew Bienfang, brokerage and wealth management services research director at TowerGroup in Needham, Mass. "This is the fastest and most efficient way to open those markets to U.S. brokerages."
International investments into China are limited to purchases of stocks listed in Hong Kong and other international exchanges, or through the limited investment opportunities offered through China's qualified foreign institutional investor program, currently being increased to $30 billion since the previous $10 billion allotment was used up.
With DTCC's help, SD&C will be able to bring the Chinese system more in line with U.S. standards and practices, Bienfang said. "This will in turn grease the capital flow into China's markets by reducing the cost and operational and settlement risk. SD&C has an opportunity to refine a model that offers familiarity and continuity to which U.S. brokers are more likely to respond positively and adopt more rapidly."
This isn't the first MOU that DTCC has with a Chinese clearing corporation. In December it signed one with a related organization, the China Government Depository Trust & Clearing Co., which handles clearing and settlement for the Chinese bond market. The SD&C agreement tightens DTCC's links with the post-trade infrastructure in China, said Callahan.
According to Chambers Yang, a partner at Shanghai-based law firm Haworth & Lexon, this deal could help lead to the eventual development of a global market for securities.
"SD&C can help U.S. investors to invest in China through DTCC," Yang said, "while DTCC can help Chinese investors to invest in U.S. through SD&C." That will not happen in the near term, however, because of the closed nature of the Chinese stock market.
Still, the MOU "is an important first step for future cooperation," commented Wenli Yuan, a Beijing-based senior analyst with Boston research firm Celent. DTCC, for its part, "could get a better understanding of business in China, a more and more important market in the financial industry," she said.
Benoit Florencon contributed to this report.
(原文参见:http://www.securitiesindustry.com/article.cfm?articleid=20790&did=4&page=3)
相关法律服务
杨春宝一级律师简介
杨春宝一级律师,大成上海高级合伙人、资本市场部主任、国资基金研究中心主任,大成中国区私募基金专业带头人、科技与文化法律研究中心联合牵头人。执业30余年,长期从事私募基金、投融资、并购重组法律服务,尤其对对赌研究颇深且具有非常丰富的实战经验,并专注于金融机构股权投资业务。2004年起多次入选The Legal 500"私募基金"和"公司与商业"等境内外各类律师榜单,代理的中国法院首例适用外国法律审理外国公司的董事损害小股东权益纠纷案入选上海高院发布的《上海法院域外法查明典型案例》和威科先行"要案头条"。入选上海涉外法律人才库、上海市司法局鼎新法治人才库、上海国有企业改制法律顾问团,具有上市公司独立董事任职资格,系多家知名高校的兼职教授或兼职研究生导师及上海市商务委跨国经营人才培训班讲师。出版《私募股权投资基金风险防控操作实务》等16本投融资法律专著。了解更多常见法律问题
DTCC与中国结算签署的谅解备忘录有何法律效力?
谅解备忘录在国际法律实践中通常属于不具有强制法律约束力的政策性或框架性文件,其核心作用在于确立双方合作的意愿、原则与具体领域,而非创设可直接执行的合同义务。在本案中,DTCC与中国证券登记结算有限公司签署的该备忘录,为双方在证券存管和清算事项上建立正式的沟通与合作渠道,构成了后续深入合作的程序性与制度性基础。从法律实务角度分析,此类备忘录虽然不能直接作为跨境交易或资金划拨的法律依据,但它在证据层面能够证明双方已就合作方向达成共识,并为未来签订具有约束力的正式协议提供铺垫。对于金融机构而言,签署谅解备忘录应明确约定条款的法律性质、保密义务、知识产权归属、争议解决机制等内容,以避免在后续合作中产生解释分歧。此外,由于跨境金融合作涉及不同法域的监管要求,备忘录本身并不豁免双方遵守各自国家的证券法、外汇管理法规及反洗钱规范。实务中,监管机构通常将此类备忘录视为行业自律协作的组成部分,不直接产生对第三方的法律效力,但可能影响监管评价。因此,企业应将其纳入合规管理流程,持续跟踪后续实施情况,并适时转化为有约束力的合作协议,以防范法律风险。
谅解备忘录如何影响中美跨境证券投资?
从跨境投资的法律与实务角度看,该谅解备忘录本身并不会直接开放或改变中国证券市场的外资准入制度,因为这类准入问题通常由更高层级的法律、行政法规及监管规章调整,例如合格境外机构投资者制度、外汇管理规则以及证券交易互联互通机制等。然而,该备忘录的意义在于为两国证券登记结算基础设施之间的技术对接、信息交换和操作协调提供了合作框架,从而间接降低跨境交易的后台成本与结算风险。具体而言,美国投资者通过合格境外机构投资者渠道投资中国资本市场时,其证券登记、托管、清算和交收环节的效率与安全性,可能受益于DTCC与中国结算之间的协作改善。反过来,中国投资者投资美国市场时,也能借助DTCC成熟的跨境处理经验,减少因制度差异导致的摩擦。法律实务中,跨境证券结算涉及的法律问题包括证券权利确认、托管链条中各方法律关系、跨境担保物权效力、破产隔离以及适用法律选择等。虽然备忘录不直接解决这些实体法问题,但它为双方监管机构和市场参与者提供了正式对话渠道,有助于在未来逐步推动双边监管合作备忘录、相互认可安排或更具体的业务合作协议。因此,该文件作为早期制度性步骤,对于促进跨境投资便利化具有积极意义,但投资者仍应关注具体准入政策变化,并通过合法合规的渠道开展投资。
中国证券登记结算体系与国际接轨需注意哪些法律风险?
中国证券登记结算体系在与国际标准接轨过程中,面临多重法律风险与实务挑战。首先是法律基础差异,我国证券登记结算制度建立在特定的法律框架内,涉及证券法、公司法以及相关监管规定,而国际成熟市场往往采纳不同的权利确认模式和结算最终性原则,因此制度移植需要充分论证兼容性与适应性。其次是跨境法律冲突风险,当境外机构通过互联互通或直接参与方式进入中国结算体系时,涉及证券权利的跨境确认、质押效力、司法管辖及判决承认等问题,需要双边司法协助或多边国际私法规则的支撑。第三是数据合规与信息安全风险,国际协作中的信息交换可能涉及到客户身份、交易记录等敏感数据,须遵守中国网络安全法、个人信息保护法以及数据出境安全管理相关规定,否则可能面临行政处罚或民事索赔。第四是操作风险与系统性风险,技术对接和业务流程改造可能导致结算失败、延迟交收或操作性错误,因此需要建立完善的应急处理机制和风险准备金制度。第五是反洗钱与反恐怖融资义务,跨境结算参与主体必须严格履行客户尽职调查、大额交易报告和可疑交易报告义务,否则将承担相应法律责任。此外,争议解决机制的设计也至关重要,双方应明确约定仲裁或诉讼管辖地、适用法律以及裁决的跨境执行方式。实务指引方面,建议分阶段推进,先开展可行性研究和模拟测试,签署详尽的业务合作协议并明确风险分配,同时持续关注监管政策动态,定期开展合规审查,以确保在接轨国际标准的同时有效控制法律风险。
以上内容仅供参考,不构成法律意见。如需专业法律服务,请联系杨春宝一级律师:chambers.yang@dentons.cn




