Part One
Case Summary
Case Summary
In 2004, we were retained to provide our whole-procedure legal service to a foreign company in its acquisition of a paper mill in North China.
The Target company is a leading company in Chinese market. The total amount of investment involved in this case exceeds USD 20,000,000.
Case Summary
The services we have rendered in this case included:
legal due diligence, design of the transaction scheme, coordination and negotiation, and preparation for legal documents.
Part Two
General Procedure of Acquisition
General Procedure of Acquisition
勏 Information Disclosure
勏 Preliminary Research
勏 Project Evaluation
General Procedure of Acquisition
勏 Due Diligence
勏 Asset Appraisal
勏 Acquisition Agreement
General Procedure of Acquisition
勏 Articles of Association
勏 Administrative Approval
勏 Industry and Commerce Registration
勏 Payment of Consideration
Part Three
Legal Due Diligence
Concept of Legal Due Diligence
劔 Investigation on the legal status of the target company
劔 Evaluation of the existent and potential legal risks in the acquisition
劔 Comment and Suggestion on the feasibility of the transaction
Procedure of Legal Due Diligence
勏 confidential agreement
勏 questionnaires
勏 interview with the relevant persons of the target company
勏 investigation in governing authorities
Procedure of Legal Due Diligence
勏 examination of the documents, materials and information collected in the interview and investigation
勏 further interview and investigation (if necessary)
勏 due diligence report
Key Points of Legal Due Diligence
刓 Basic Information
刓 History Evolution
刓 Ownership and Organization
刓 Personnel
Key Points of Legal Due Diligence
刓 Operations (licences, approvals...)
刓 Finance
刓 Assets
刓 Contractual Obligations
刓 Legal Proceedings
Case Analysis
Background of the Target Company
- private company
- advanced technology and facilities
- actually controlled by a ¨group company〃
Case Analysis
the work we did during the investigation
- issued questionnaires to the management of the Target and the management of the ¨Group Company〃;
- conducted the interviews with the officials of the Target and the ¨Group Company〃;
Case Analysis
the work we did during the investigation
- conducted the investigation in the local governing authorities, including the Administration for Industry and Commerce, Environment Protection Bureau, Labor and Social Security Bureau, Land Resources Bureau, the House Property Bureau and other related authorities
Case Analysis
the problems we focused on
A. the Connection between the Target and the ¨Group Company〃
Case Analysis
I. Most of the Targetˇs major shareholders are also the shareholders of the ¨Group Company〃; all the Targetˇs directors are directors of the ¨Group Company〃;
Case Analysis
II. When establishing the Target, its shareholders, to fulfill the contribution, have taken the assets which should legally belong to the ¨Group Company〃;
Case Analysis
III. The ownership of the land used by the Target is owned by the Target while the buildings was built by the ¨Group Company〃
Case Analysis
IV. The production equipment of the Target are purchased by the ¨Group Company〃 and provided to the Target;
Case Analysis
V. The raw materials used by the Target is imported by the ¨Group Company〃;
Case Analysis
VI. Part of the electric power used by the Target is supplied by the electricity company controlled by the ¨Group Company〃;
Case Analysis
VII. The Target is using the trademark belonging to the ¨Group Company〃;
Case Analysis
VIII. The local tax intended to be borne by the Target is paid by the ¨Group Company〃;
Case Analysis
IX. Both parties have no written documents evidencing that the Target has owed a huge amount of debt to the ¨Group Company〃.
Case Analysis
X. There is a mixture of the assets, funds and expenses between the ¨Group Company〃 and the Target.
Case Analysis
the problems we focused on
B. the Confirmation of the Targetˇs Property
Case Analysis
a. Land
b. Buildings
c. Material equipments
Case Analysis
the problems we focused on
C. Environment Protection
Case Analysis
The Target does get underground water in its production while not obtaining the Permit for Taking Groundwater.
A project of the Target has not obtained the approval from the local Environment Protection Bureau.
Case Analysis
the problems we focused on
D. Labor and Social Security
Case Analysis
a. The Target has not paid social security fee complying with the laws and regulations of the state.
b. The employees of the Target should be lawfully settled, and the labor relationship with some key persons of the Target shall be well kept.
Case Analysis
Our suggestion on the arrangement of the transaction
WFOE or JV ?
Equity Purchase or Asset Purchase?
Case Analysis
WFOE or JV
In a WFOE, the foreign investor will have its exclusive decision-making power.
If case of JV, the domestic investorˇs commercial resources in the local area may help the development of the company.
N Please note: any restriction for WFOE?
Case Analysis
Equity or Asset
Equity purchase is generally the simplest and quickest method to complete, and it will help the company to retain some special license or qualification.
In an asset acquisition, the acquirer may acquire select assets and liabilities of the target. There, consequently, is an opportunity to carve out unwanted assets and liabilities, and avoid some legal risks.
Case Analysis
Solution:
勏 Set up a WFOE in China;
勏 Purchase the assests of the Target;
勏 Enter into non-competition agreement and long-term supply agreement with the ¨Group Company〃.
Thank You!
Thanks for your Trust and Support !
相关法律服务
杨春宝一级律师简介
杨春宝一级律师,大成上海高级合伙人、资本市场部主任、国资基金研究中心主任,大成中国区私募基金专业带头人、科技与文化法律研究中心联合牵头人。执业30余年,长期从事私募基金、投融资、并购重组法律服务,尤其对对赌研究颇深且具有非常丰富的实战经验,并专注于金融机构股权投资业务。2004年起多次入选The Legal 500"私募基金"和"公司与商业"等境内外各类律师榜单,代理的中国法院首例适用外国法律审理外国公司的董事损害小股东权益纠纷案入选上海高院发布的《上海法院域外法查明典型案例》和威科先行"要案头条"。入选上海涉外法律人才库、上海市司法局鼎新法治人才库、上海国有企业改制法律顾问团,具有上市公司独立董事任职资格,系多家知名高校的兼职教授或兼职研究生导师及上海市商务委跨国经营人才培训班讲师。出版《私募股权投资基金风险防控操作实务》等16本投融资法律专著。了解更多常见法律问题
在跨境并购中,法律尽职调查的核心目的是什么?它通常包括哪些步骤?
法律尽职调查的核心目的是全面调查目标公司的法律状态,评估并购中存在的和潜在的法律风险,并对交易的可行性提出评论与建议。它并非简单的文件审查,而是通过系统化的步骤识别风险,为交易结构设计奠定基础。根据文章,尽职调查的步骤通常包括:首先签署保密协议,然后向目标公司管理层发出调查问卷,接着对目标公司相关负责人进行访谈,并在当地政府主管部门(如工商局、环保局、人社局、国土局、房产局等)进行实地调查。之后,审查访谈和调查中收集到的文件、材料及信息,必要时进行补充访谈和调查,最终出具详尽的尽职调查报告。关键审查点涵盖目标公司基本信息、历史沿革、资产权属、合同义务、环保合规、劳动社保、法律诉讼等多个方面。例如在案例中,律师通过调查发现了目标公司与关联集团公司在资产、人员、商标、债务等方面存在混同问题,以及环保许可缺失、社保欠缴等风险,从而为后续交易方案提供了依据。因此,尽职调查是并购中不可或缺的防线,其质量直接影响交易的安全与效率。
在文章案例中,为什么最终建议采用外商独资企业形式并通过资产收购方式?与股权收购相比,资产收购有何优势?
文章案例中,最终建议采用外商独资企业(WFOE)形式并通过资产收购方式,主要基于两点考虑:一是WFOE能让外国投资者拥有独家决策权,避免合资企业(JV)中中方合作伙伴可能带来的商业资源依赖或决策分歧;二是资产收购允许收购方有选择地购买目标公司的资产和负债,从而剥离不良或风险资产,有效规避法律风险。具体而言,该案例中目标公司与关联集团公司在资产、人员、商标、债务等方面存在严重混同,且存在环保许可缺失、社保欠缴等问题,若采用股权收购,收购方将继承目标公司全部历史风险和潜在债务,包括关联公司混同带来的连带责任。而资产收购则使收购方可以只购买目标公司有价值的生产设备、土地、厂房等核心资产,同时通过签订非竞争协议和长期供应协议保障交易安全,将集团公司的商标使用权、原材料供应等关键商业关系以合同形式固定下来,从而在剥离风险的同时维持业务连续性。虽然股权收购通常程序更简单快捷,且有助于保留目标公司的特殊许可证或资质,但在本案的复杂风险背景下,资产收购的灵活性和风险隔离优势更为突出。此外,选择WFOE也避免了合资企业可能存在的限制或审批问题,确保外国投资者对收购后的运营拥有完全控制权。
文章案例中,目标公司与关联集团公司之间存在哪些典型的混同风险?这些风险如何影响并购交易?
在文章案例中,目标公司与关联集团公司之间存在显著的混同风险,具体表现为:1. 人员混同:主要股东和董事高度重合,集团公司的管理层同时控制目标公司;2. 资产混同:目标公司设立时的出资资产实际属于集团公司,土地归目标公司但建筑物由集团公司建造,生产设备由集团公司购买并提供,原材料由集团公司进口,电力由集团公司控制的电力公司供应;3. 商标混同:目标公司无偿使用集团公司的商标,无书面协议;4. 债务混同:集团公司代目标公司缴纳税款,且双方之间有大额未书面记录的债务,资产、资金和费用相互混合。这些混同风险对并购交易产生重大影响:首先,目标公司的独立法人地位受到质疑,资产权属不清,收购方可能无法获得清晰的资产所有权,或在后续运营中面临集团公司对资产主张权利的风险。其次,集团公司可能因代付税款、供电等行为而对目标公司享有债权,这些隐性债务在股权收购中会直接转移给收购方。第三,商标使用无书面授权,收购后若目标公司继续使用该商标可能构成侵权。第四,环保许可缺失和社保欠缴等合规问题若未解决,可能导致行政处罚或停产风险。因此,在尽职调查中识别出这些混同问题后,交易方案设计必须考虑如何隔离风险,如通过资产收购剥离目标公司的不良资产和债务,同时以非竞争协议和长期供应协议等方式与集团公司建立清晰的法律关系,确保收购后业务独立、合规运营。
以上内容仅供参考,不构成法律意见。如需专业法律服务,请联系杨春宝一级律师:chambers.yang@dentons.cn



