文章摘要 本文梳理了杨律师近三十年的法律实务经验，涵盖公司与证券、外商投资、房地产与建筑工程、知识产权、互联网与电子商务等多个专业领域。杨律师曾为多家国有企业、外商投资企业及高科技公司提供法律服务，处理过公司设立、股权转让、并购清算、房地产项目全流程、知识产权争议及域名纠纷等典型案件。其中涉及外商投资企业特别清算、商标与反不正当竞争、域名争议等案例具有行业代表性。文章对了解中国律师在复杂商事与新兴科技领域的实务能力具有参考价值，也为企业选聘法律顾问提供了背景依据。
关键词：外商投资公司并购知识产权房地产法律域名争议
Mr. Yang worked as an in-house counsel with Shanghai Southeast Company of CMST after his graduation from Fudan University . Since 1995 when he became an attorney-at-law, Mr. Yang has been retained as the legal counsel of many state-owned corporations, foreign-invested enterprises and private high-tech companies, including Raw Water Company (PLC), Nippon Paint, Shanghai Futures Exchange, Wuxi Life Technology Park, Xianfeng Pharmaceuticals, New Asiatic Pharmaceuticals, Munich Trade Fairs, Dealeasy Electronics , Viva Eco Electronics & Technology, Haiwen Group, Huabo Science and Technology Group, Vzoom Science and Technology.
Mr. Yang has handled a number of cases in incorporation, shares issuance and equity transfer, merger & acquisition and liquidation of foreign-invested companies, private and state-owned companies, of which the special liquidation of Haijing Hotel Co., Ltd. is the first case of special liquidation of a foreign-invested company in Shanghai . Mr. Yang has handled many typical cases, including the incorporation of Shanghai Suzhou River Integrated Construction Co., Ltd. (wholly state-owned), Wuxi Life Science & Technology Development Stock Company, the joint venture between Shanghai Pharma Group and Italian SOLGMA Group, M & A of some domestic and foreign-invested companies, etc. Mr. Yang was invited to give keynote speeches on foreign investment laws and policies in China at some international and national conferences, including the China Food & Drinks Retail & Distribution Conference, the Ports & Liners China 2002 and China Containers 2004.
Mr. Yang has provided legal services for the whole procedure of some large real estate development projects including the New Bond Garden and the Future Star Town, the whole procedure of workshop construction by Nippon Paint and BauschLinnemann, including co-operation negotiation, incorporation of the project company, project design, construction, project financing, sale and rent and property management. Mr. Yang has also provided legal services for a number of cases of real estate transfer projects, including those transfers for the Central Plaza and the Christ Plaza (of which the Central Plaza transfer project was honored as one of the best-resolved cases by the Ministry of Justice, China ). In addition, Mr. Yang has handled many cases on real estate co-operation development, sale and rent, property management, hotel management, construction, etc.
Mr. Yang has resolved some disputes in copyright, trade mark, trade name and anti-unfair competition, of which the “Pure” water case attracts much attention from the legal circle for its relation to trade mark, anti-unfair competition, corporate management and shareholder's interest. And the Nippon Paint anti-unfair competition case also drew much attention from the society. Mr. Yang is engaged as an expert by Beijing Jiuzhou Shichu Intellectual Property Right Appraisal Center .
Mr. Yang is also specialized in Internet, telecommunication and e-commerce law. He has been invited to attend the First E-commerce Legislation Forum and a number of other forums and seminars. His article of “Legal Issues on Domain Name and its Management” was included in the book of Economic & Legal Development under the Global Background , and the article of “Restructuring a Scientific & Unified Domain Name Management System” was published in the journal of “ Electronic Intellectual Property Right ”. The article of “International Business Arbitration of the Internet Age” was published by China Daily. Mr. Yang is engaged as an expert by the Domain Name Dispute Service Center affiliated to the United States domain name Doctor Consulting Company. Mr. Yang is also the legal counsel of Vzoom and Jianding Construction Website, providing special legal services for the systematic website development of Shanghai Futures Exchange. Mr. Yang is the attorney for the case of the domain name dispute between Amazon Co. and a Shanghai Company.
相关法律服务
杨春宝一级律师简介
杨春宝一级律师，大成上海高级合伙人、资本市场部主任、国资基金研究中心主任，大成中国区私募基金专业带头人、科技与文化法律研究中心联合牵头人。执业30余年，长期从事私募基金、投融资、并购重组法律服务，尤其对对赌研究颇深且具有非常丰富的实战经验，并专注于金融机构股权投资业务。2004年起多次入选The Legal 500"私募基金"和"公司与商业"等境内外各类律师榜单，代理的中国法院首例适用外国法律审理外国公司的董事损害小股东权益纠纷案入选上海高院发布的《上海法院域外法查明典型案例》和威科先行"要案头条"。入选上海涉外法律人才库、上海市司法局鼎新法治人才库、上海国有企业改制法律顾问团，具有上市公司独立董事任职资格，系多家知名高校的兼职教授或兼职研究生导师及上海市商务委跨国经营人才培训班讲师。出版《私募股权投资基金风险防控操作实务》等16本投融资法律专著。了解更多常见法律问题
域名争议解决机制与商标权保护有何关联？
域名争议解决机制与商标权保护之间具有密切关联，核心在于防止他人恶意注册或使用与商标相同或近似的域名，从而利用商标权人的商誉获取不正当利益。根据相关法律规则，域名争议解决主要适用统一域名争议解决政策，该政策适用于顶级域名下的域名注册争议。投诉人若要获得支持，通常需要同时证明三个条件：其一，争议域名与投诉人享有权利的商标或服务标识相同或具有足以导致混淆的近似性；其二，被投诉人对争议域名不享有权利或合法利益；其三，被投诉人对争议域名的注册和使用具有恶意。在实务中，恶意情形通常包括为出售、出租或转让域名而注册并索取高于实际成本费用的对价，或者为阻止商标权人使用对应域名而注册，又或者通过制造与商标权人之间的混淆误导互联网用户以获取商业利益。域名争议仲裁程序与司法诉讼相比具有更快、成本较低的特点，但裁决并非终局，当事人仍可向法院提起诉讼。与商标权保护的关联方面，商标权是域名投诉的基础权利，但域名本身并不等同于商标，域名注册机构一般不审查域名是否侵犯他人在先权利，因此商标权人需要主动通过争议程序或诉讼维护权益。实务操作指引方面，企业应当提前布局，将核心商标和重要品牌及时注册为域名，并考虑注册不同后缀及近似的预防性域名。同时应保存商标注册证书、域名注册时间、使用证据等材料，以备争议时提交。风险提示在于，若商标权人长期未对近似域名采取行动，可能被认定为默许或放弃权利，进而影响后续维权效果。常见争议焦点包括域名与商标的近似判断标准、被投诉人对域名是否享有合法权益（如善意使用、非商业性使用等），以及如何认定恶意的具体证据。本案中涉及的国际知名企业与本地公司之间的域名争议，体现了跨地域、跨法域商标保护与域名管理规则的复杂交织，也提醒企业在全球化经营中需要建立系统的域名监控与应对机制。
以上内容仅供参考，不构成法律意见。如需专业法律服务，请联系杨春宝一级律师：chambers.yang@dentons.cn
